chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, has
been challenged by ICCwatch to account for why he has not launched an investigation
into the clear and all too well documented use of child soldiers by rebel forces
This is all the more puzzling because at present, Thomas Lubanga,
a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, is on trial in The Hague for allegedly
using young boys in his rebel movement.
The Justice and Equality Movement
(JEM), together with other Darfuri rebel groups have been accused of forcibly
recruiting children and then sending them into battle against the Sudanese military.
In May 2008 91 child soldiers were rescued from JEM following its attack on Khartoum
in which 200 people were killed. The UN rights rapporteur, Sima Samar, successfully
negotiated the release of the child soldiers on the part of the government.
Last year, the Waging Peace campaign collected evidence of Darfur rebel recruitment
of child soldiers in refugee camps in Eastern Chad with the tacit approval
of the Chadian government. The United Nations peacekeeping operation in Darfur
has estimated that in 2007 between 7,000 and 10,000 youngsters had been forced
into military service. The UNs Peacekeeping child protection unit has placed
JEM on a list of child soldier recruiters.
Waging Peace in June 2008 requested
that Mr Moreno-Ocampo launch an investigation into what has been taking place
in this regard in the camps of Eastern Chad and Darfur. So far, the organisation
has not received any response from the International Criminal Court.
Glendening, director of ICCwatch, in his letter to the ICC chief prosecutor,
"It is extraordinary that you have failed to launch
an investigation into the horrific activities of JEM in using child soldiers and
other forces operating in Darfur in using child soldiers given the current prosecution
of Thomas Lubanga for precisely this crime.
"Your failure to indicate
any interest whatsoever in relation to the very serious accusations made by the
United Nations and Waging Peace concerning the use of child soldiers in Darfur
leaves the ICC open to the charge that it is motivated by highly selective, partisan
political motivations in relation to what is taking place in the region.
ICC is not an organisation whose activities can currently be said to be consistent
with the rule of law.
"Despite your frequently made allegations against
the government of Sudan, you have failed to demonstrate any serious inclination
to hold JEM to account for the human rights violations that they have been inflicting
on children and other Darfurians."
The ICC has faced frequent
claims that it is highly selective when it comes to investigating alleged human
rights abuses in civil war situations and also in terms of its failure to pursue
individuals from non-African countries.
For more information concerning
ICCwatch's critique of the International Criminal Court, please refer to